battle chasers nightwar ps4 release date

#Battle chasers nightwar ps4 release date manual#

Explore an overworld presented in classic form (and in real time), peppered with hidden dungeons, rare bosses and randomly appearing friends and foes, as well as a useful arsenal of Dungeon Abilites for every character.

Choose three of the many heroes you’ve unlocked, fill your travel backpack with items from your stash, make sure you’ve chosen the best equipment and abilities for each hero… and then strike out.

But, as it stands I am not really disliking it. I would consider a save point and a potential game over screen to the revive at the Inn thing they have going on. But like Munnky says, I don't know if there is going to be a reason to go back in the same game if only because I don't know if there is actual branching paths.

#Battle chasers nightwar ps4 release date manual#

I too would prefer a manual save point and slot selection in favor of that. He has to go, find the save, back it up, label it something he can easily recognize and then reload it to go back.

Yeah, a buddy of mine does that with every game he really gets into. (Again, if only I had known what method they were going to use ahead of time.) which was so user unfriendly and unintuitive to the point where I just gave up on and resented that franchise, and I'm kicking myself now for backing at the trilogy tier. Otherwise I might have to 'banner saga' it and keep a manual backup of my save files. I Just want the ability to Hard save into however many slots as many times as I want so that I can return and retry/replay something if I wish to do so. It was more common in this genre than save anywhere anyway. Sure I'd be onboard with introducing save points then, that's fine. Originally posted by Stoibs:I guess RPG's have changed, since this doesn't seem all that common for me or resemble what I think of when I recall the golden era of Jrpg's. I feel like it's out of place in this type of game. I wouldn't mind if they chose between autosave and save points myself, but I am against just a quick save function. I mean, this is pretty common place among this style of RPG. I, however, would not say that it's a blurring the line into the rogue-like/lite genre though.

The reasons you gave above are fine, and it's good that you just said that maybe you want to save scrum, I didn't really want to put it out there since many read it as a bad word, despite it being somewhat common and I have done it myself sometimes. I do like RPG's though, its these awkward instances where they blur the line and tout themselves as one thing whilst delivering an experience that resembles another that becomes aggravating to no end. There's a reason I specifically avoid the Roguelike genre - I don't at all find it enjoyable or fun. Unless these are merely shortcoming of the Beta, then yes I am forced into a playstyle that isn't at all preferable, wasn't at all made clear at the time of backing, and isn't at all what I think of when I recall Jrpg's of old. What If I want to replay an area, try a battle a different way or more efficiently, just have separate slots for whatever savescumming reason I choose? There's only save on quit or the aforementioned auto saves. Originally posted by Stoibs:There's no save option, there's no option to save to a specific slot.